2025 Women's Volleyball Standings
2025 Women's Volleyball Standings
| School |
School |
Conf |
Conference |
CPct. |
Overall |
Overall |
Pct. |
Streak |
| Earlham |
|
4-0 |
4-0 |
1.000 |
16-6 |
16-6 |
.727 |
W5 |
| Mount St. Joseph |
|
4-0 |
4-0 |
1.000 |
9-11 |
9-11 |
.450 |
W2 |
| Transylvania |
|
3-1 |
3-1 |
.750 |
17-6 |
17-6 |
.739 |
W3 |
| Rose-Hulman |
|
2-2 |
2-2 |
.500 |
14-8 |
14-8 |
.636 |
W1 |
| Hanover |
|
2-2 |
2-2 |
.500 |
14-9 |
14-9 |
.609 |
L1 |
| Franklin |
|
2-2 |
2-2 |
.500 |
13-11 |
13-11 |
.542 |
L2 |
| Anderson |
|
1-3 |
1-3 |
.250 |
9-9 |
9-9 |
.500 |
W1 |
| Manchester |
|
1-3 |
1-3 |
.250 |
10-11 |
10-11 |
.476 |
L4 |
| Bluffton |
|
1-3 |
1-3 |
.250 |
12-15 |
12-15 |
.444 |
L1 |
| Berea |
|
0-4 |
0-4 |
.000 |
7-15 |
7-15 |
.318 |
L1 |
The top eight teams will advance to the 2025 HCAC Volleyball Championship.
X = eliminated from championship
Seeding for the conference tournament will be based on regular season conference record. In case of a tie for seeding, the tie will be broken by:
- Head-to-head competition (matches)
- Conference games winning percentage between tied teams (all conference sets played)
- The team’s record in matches against the top ranked teams, beginning at the top of the HCAC standings and comparing against opponents one-by-one down through the standings from top to bottom.
- Percentage of points won (total points won/total points played).
- Total points played includes total points won and lost with designated conference matches.
- Multiple ties (e.g., 3-way tie) will be broken using approved HCAC policy for all sports, which reads as follows...
When there are a cluster of teams tied (3 or more), the selection/seeding process will first attempt to separate the tie by using head to head comparisons of the total number of wins and loses among those teams in the tie to emerge (produce a top team) from that cluster of teams. Once a team emerges from the initial tie the process will be repeated starting with head to head comparisons in order to resolve all remaining seeds. (Example: Three teams tied. Within the cluster the records reflect head to head results as follows: Team A 2-1; Team B 1-1; Team C 1-2. Team A would emerge and receive the top seed and the process of comparing head to head records would begin with the remaining ties. When two teams are tied or multiple ties cannot be broken using the aforementioned process the criteria from the specific sports guidelines would be applied and followed to emerge a team. Again, once a team emerges the process would be repeated from the start each time a team emerges until all seeds are resolved.)